U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Roberts v. Stridiron

Roberts v. Stridiron
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 23, 2003

Roberts v. Stridiron

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7477

ALRICK LEWIS ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

IVER STRIDIRON; HORACE MAGRAS; RUSSELL L.

BORAAS; S.K. YOUNG, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-237-7)

Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 23, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alrick Lewis Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Alrick Lewis Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberts v. Stridiron, No. CA-03-237-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.