Joshua Fluellen appeals the district court’s order and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fluellen v. Epstein, No. CA-02-2091 (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED