U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Gaskins

United States v. Gaskins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2003 · Niemeyer, Motz, Hamilton
85 F. App'x 318

United States v. Gaskins

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Craig Dehaven Gaskins appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Correct Sentence.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gaskins, No. CR-00-14 (E.D.Va. Aug. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.