In re: Seale v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In re: Seale v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7318

In Re: COLIN SEALE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-97-663, CA-00-918)

Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 22, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Colin Seale, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Colin Seale petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that

the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing

the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals

that the district court has now ruled on his § 2255 motion.

Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided

Seale’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant

Seale’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished