U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

O'Neal v. United States

O'Neal v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 22, 2003
55 F. App'x 143

O'Neal v. United States

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Rose M. O’Neal appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing her Federal Tort Claims Act complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See O’Neal v. United States, CA-02-870-A (E.D.Va. Sept. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.