U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

O'Neal v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 22, 2003

55 F. App'x 143

Counsel

Rose M. O’Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

O'Neal v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Rose M. O’Neal appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing her Federal Tort Claims Act complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See O’Neal v. United States, CA-02-870-A (E.D.Va. Sept. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.