U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Brooks v. Maryland

Brooks v. Maryland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 24, 2003
55 F. App'x 160

Brooks v. Maryland

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Alec Rodney Brooks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brooks v. Maryland, No. CA-02-494-MJG (D.Md. Sept. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.