Crudup v. Seay

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 26, 2003

Crudup v. Seay, 56 F. App'x 181 (4th Cir. 2003)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Sylvester Crudup appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Crudup v. Seay, No. CA-02-755-2 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the *182facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Sylvester CRUDUP v. Marcia SEAY, Grievance Coordinator/Institutional Ombudsman S. Hughes, Grievance, Institutional Ombudsman L.B. Collins, Inmate Hearing Officer K. Orie, Correctional Officer W. Best, Lieutenant, Correctional Officer A. Netherland, Captain, Correctional Officer A.S. Scott, Captain, Correctional Officer J. Keitt, Captain, Correctional Officer L. Booker, Correctional Officer S. Moore, Sergeant, Correctional Officer A.L. Johnson, Captain, Correctional Officer W. Penn, Correctional Officer Susan Carson, Operations Officer C.C. Murphy, Assistant Warden of Operations Alton Baskerville, Warden W.P. Roger, Regional Director P.M. Henick, Regional Ombudsman
Status: Published