Bradshaw v. Ginn

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Bradshaw v. Ginn, 56 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2003)

Bradshaw v. Ginn

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

William A. Bradshaw seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some claims and defendants from his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Bradshaw seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
William A. BRADSHAW v. Nancy GINN, Work Release Coordinator Officer Williams Dr. Kolongo, Medical Officer Roy W. Cherry, Superintendent Mary Tarnowski, Medical Supervisor
Status
Published