U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Wilson v. Glendening

Wilson v. Glendening
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 27, 2003
56 F. App'x 189

Wilson v. Glendening

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant inmates appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellants’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the dismissal of their complaint *190for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilson v. Glendening, No. CA-02-3514-S (D.Md. Nov. 14, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.