Baker v. Johnson
Baker v. Johnson
Opinion of the Court
Bernard M. Baker, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge construing Baker’s petition as arising under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and denying relief. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Baker has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039-40, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.