Brown v. Metts

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Brown v. Metts, 60 F. App'x 496 (4th Cir. 2003)

Brown v. Metts

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Brown appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Metts, No. CA-99-1040-3-10BC (D.S.C. Oct. 4 & 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Frederick BROWN v. James R. METTS, Sheriff Captain Williams Major Harris EMSA Correctional Medical Care Services Aramark Correctional Services, Defendants-Appellees Frederick Brown v. James R. Metts, Sheriff Captain Williams Major Harris EMSA Correctional Medical Care Services Aramark Correctional Services
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published