U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. America Online, Inc.

United States v. America Online, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 2, 2003 · Niemeyer, Shedd
61 F. App'x 895

United States v. America Online, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Lindsay Jenkins appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to quash a John Doe summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service, and denying her motion for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Does, No. CA-02-42-MC (E.D.Va. filed Dec. 20, 2002; entered Dec. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.