U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Brevard

United States v. Brevard
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 27, 2003 · Hamilton, Traxler, Williams
62 F. App'x 462

United States v. Brevard

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Brian Keith Brevard seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying relief on his motion under the All Writs Act that the court construed as a petition for a writ of coram nobis. 28 U.S.C. § 1651. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brevard has not established reversible error. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); United States v. Brevard, No. CR-98-297 V (W.D.N.C. June 20 & Nov. 22, 2002). Accordingly, we deny his motion for appointment of counsel and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.