U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Pikkert v. Pastene

Pikkert v. Pastene
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 20, 2003 · Hamilton, King, Luttig
63 F. App'x 166

Pikkert v. Pastene

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Alexander Pastene seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order remanding his civil action to state court. The magistrate judge’s remand order is not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.