Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Whitehead v. Viacom, Inc.

Whitehead v. Viacom, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 21, 2003 · No. 03-1148 · King, Michael, Widener
63 F. App'x 175

Counsel

David L. Whitehead, Appellant Pro Se. Paul R. Taskier, Dickstein, Shapiro, Morin & Oshinsky, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Whitehead v. Viacom, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

David L. Whitehead appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motion for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Whitehead v. Viacom, Inc., 233 F.Supp.2d 715 (D.Md. 2002). We deny Whitehead’s motions for an evidentiary hearing, for injunctive relief, and to strike the Appellee’s informal brief, and dispense *176with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.