U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Greene v. McGraw

Greene v. McGraw
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 21, 2003 · Traxler, Widener, Wilkinson
63 F. App'x 715

Greene v. McGraw

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Donald Lee Greene appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Greene v. McGraw, No. CA-02-626-7 (W.D.Va. June 20, Aug. 16, Oct. 15 & Nov. 13, 2002). We deny Greene’s motion for leave to amend and to add a party. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.