U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Peele

United States v. Peele
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 22, 2003 · Hamilton, King, Luttig
63 F. App'x 734

United States v. Peele

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Tina Louise Peele seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Peele has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.