U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Edwards v. Oberndori

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 2003 · Motz, Widener, Wilkinson

63 F. App'x 756

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Johnnie Lang Edwards appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Edwards v. Oberndori, No. CA-02-347-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *757and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.