U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Foster v. United States

Foster v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 29, 2003 · Hamilton, King, Luttig
63 F. App'x 776

Foster v. United States

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Michael Foster appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Foster, Nos. CR-01-44; CA-02-1346-2 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 19, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.