Brightwell v. Hutchinson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Brightwell v. Hutchinson, 70 F. App'x 699 (4th Cir. 2003)

Brightwell v. Hutchinson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

David Brightwell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brightwell has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
David BRIGHTWELL v. Ronald HUTCHINSON, Warden, Maryland House of Corrections Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published