Taylor v. Maryland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Taylor v. Maryland, 75 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2003)

Taylor v. Maryland

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Delonte E. Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Taylor v. Maryland, No. CA-02-4039-JFM (D.Md. Mar. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *197the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Delonte E. TAYLOR v. The State of MARYLAND Stuart O. Simms, Esquire, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services of the State of Maryland William Sondervan, Commissioner of Corrections, State of Maryland Ronald Hutchinson, Warden, Maryland House of Corrections, Jessup, and John Doe, I, Correctional Officer, Maryland House of Corrections, Jessup John Doe, II, Correctional Officer, Maryland House of Corrections, Jessup John Doe, III, Correctional Officer, Maryland House of Corrections, Jessup
Status
Published