Roberts v. Stridiron

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Roberts v. Stridiron, 83 F. App'x 556 (4th Cir. 2003)

Roberts v. Stridiron

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Alrick Lewis Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberts v. Stridiron, No. CA-03-237-7 (W.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Alrick Lewis ROBERTS, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Iver STRIDIRON Horace Magras Russell L. Boraas S.K. Young, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Published