United States v. Bryson
United States v. Bryson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7395
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-01-240)
Submitted: December 18, 2003 Decided: January 16, 2004
Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William M. Bryson, Jr., seeks to appeal from the district
court’s order denying his request that the court direct the
Internal Revenue Service to present evidence to support the
forfeiture of various parcels of real estate. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292(2000). Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541(1949). The order Bryson seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished