McLaughlin-Cox v. Maryland Parole

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

McLaughlin-Cox v. Maryland Parole

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7415

JOHN WAYNE MCLAUGHLIN-COX,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-4204-MJG)

Submitted: December 18, 2003 Decided: January 16, 2004

Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John McLaughlin-Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Howe Baron, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John McLaughlin-Cox appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

McLaughlin-Cox v. Maryland Parole Comm’n, No. CA-02-4204-MJG (D.

Md. Aug. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished