Watts v. Eastern-Taylor
Opinion
Andre Sylvester Watts appeals the district court’s denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion in which he sought to vacate its judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Finding no reversible error, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. See Watts v. Eastern-Taylor, No. CA-02-861-AM (E.D. Va. July 28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Andre Sylvester WATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. EASTERN-TAYLOR, S-L Post Officer; Lieutenant Hicks; Sergeant Byrd, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished