Williams v. Sheedy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Williams v. Sheedy, 86 F. App'x 570 (4th Cir. 2004)

Williams v. Sheedy

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

George Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Sheedy, No. CA-03-1439 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 3, 2003 & entered Oct. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
George WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael SHEEDY, Warden; Janie W. Rouse; James Blackwell, Major; Kenneth Sharp, Lieutenant; Nurse Hill, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished