Etokie v. Disability Action
Etokie v. Disability Action
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2291
EPHRAIM U. ETOKIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1701-3)
Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 27, 2004
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ephraim U. Etokie, Appellant Pro Se. Herbert E. Buhl, III, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Ephraim U. Etokie appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge granting
summary judgment to his former employer in his civil action
alleging discrimination under various statutes. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Etokie v. The Disability
Action Ctr., Inc., No. CA-02-1701-3 (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished