United States v. Wooden

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Wooden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7487

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HERMAN WOODEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-18; CA-96-1591-A)

Submitted: December 19, 2003 Decided: February 3, 2004

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herman Wooden, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Herman Wooden appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for post conviction relief and denying reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, although we grant Wooden leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we affirm the decision of the district court because

Wooden was not entitled to a sentence reduction pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(2000) and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a) & (c) (2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished