White v. Clark

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

White v. Clark

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7390

RODNEY WHITE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COUNSELOR CLARK; LIEUTENANT COMPTON; SERGEANT ANDERSON; JESSEE; WARDEN YOUNG; INVESTIGATOR WILLIAMS; MAJOR YATES; B. J. DAVIS, Operations Officer; WARDEN PHILLIS; S. RIDER; R. RAVIZEE, Grievance Department; L. HUFFMAN, Regional Director; SERGEANT COPE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-392-7)

Submitted: January 28, 2004 Decided: February 13, 2004

Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney White, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Rodney Fernell White appeals from the dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) action for failure to state a claim pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Thus, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. White v. Clark, No. CA-03-

392-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished