U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

Lewis v. Ugly Duckling Car

Lewis v. Ugly Duckling Car
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 13, 2004

Lewis v. Ugly Duckling Car

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1942

WILLIAM MAXWELL LEWIS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UGLY DUCKLING CAR SALES; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Henrico County; HANOVER COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-741)

Submitted: January 30, 2004 Decided: February 13, 2004

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William M. Lewis, Jr., Apellant Pro Se. Jay Owen Millman, BRENNER, DOHNAL, EVANS & YOFFY, Richmond, Virginia; James Thomas Moore, III, HENRICO COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia; Jeremy David Capps, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: William M. Lewis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for mistrial and default. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lewis v. Ugly Duckling Car Sales, No. CA-02-741 (E.D. Va. July 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.