Anderson v. Pearson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Anderson v. Pearson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7287

HAROLD E. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EDDIE PEARSON, in his individual capacity; LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1292-7)

Submitted: January 30, 2004 Decided: February 13, 2004

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel M. Schember, GAFFNEY & SCHEMBER, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Jerry W. Kilgore, Attorney General, Mark R. Davis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Harold E. Anderson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Anderson v. Pearson, No. CA-02-1292-7 (W.D. Va. July 21, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished