Helina Tesfaye, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of her applications for asylum and withholding of removal.

Tesfaye first challenges the IJ’s finding that her asylum application is untimely. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B), (D) (2000); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(4) (2003). We conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review this claim pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2000). Tesfaye next disputes the IJ’s finding that she failed to qualify for withholding of removal. We have reviewed the record and the IJ’s decision, which was designated by the Board as the final agency determination, and find that she indeed failed to meet her burden of proof to establish her eligibility for this relief. See Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 324 n. 13 (4th Cir. 2002).

We accordingly dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART, AND DENIED IN PART