Christopher Langdon appeals from the district court’s order imposing a prefiling *555 injunction. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Langdon v. Garner, Nos. CA-01-746-5-BO, CA-01-816-5-BO, CA-01-906-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2003). We grant Langdon’s motion to amend his informal brief, deny his motion for stay pending appeal, deny Langdon’s motions for an extension to file a response, for appointment of counsel and oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED