Kling v. Harris Teeter, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 10, 2004

Kling v. Harris Teeter, Inc., 86 F. App'x 662 (4th Cir. 2004)

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Christine Kling and Cynthia Kling appeal the magistrate judge’s order * granting summary judgment for Defendants in the Klings’ civil action. We have reviewed the briefs, the joint appendix, and the magistrate judge’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Kling v. Harris Teeter, Inc., No. CA-00-609-3 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

This case was decided by a magistrate judge upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000).

Reference

Full Case Name: Christine KLING; Cynthia Kling, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARRIS TEETER, INCORPORATED; City of Monroe, North Carolina, a Body Politic and Corporate; C.S. Horne, A/K/A Chris Horne, Individually and in His Capacity as an Officer of Monroe Public Safety, Defendants-Appellees
Status: Unpublished