Christine Kling and Cynthia Kling appeal the magistrate judge’s order * granting summary judgment for Defendants in the Klings’ civil action. We have reviewed the briefs, the joint appendix, and the magistrate judge’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Kling v. Harris Teeter, Inc., No. CA-00-609-3 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED