McLamb v. Dalius

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

McLamb v. Dalius

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7753

THOMAS LATTIE MCLAMB,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W. F. DALIUS, Warden; KATHLEEN HAWK-SAWYER, Director; J. FRANK BRADSHER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-662-5-BO)

Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 9, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Lattie McLamb, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Thomas Lattie McLamb appeals the district court’s order

and order on reconsideration denying his Bivens* claim. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See McLamb v. Dalius, No. CA-03-

662-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 8 & Oct. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971).

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished