White v. Taylor

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 20, 2004

White v. Taylor, 88 F. App'x 584 (4th Cir. 2004)

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Billy White appeals the magistrate judge’s orders denying his motions for appointment of counsel in his suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See White v. Taylor, No. CA-02-385 (E.D.Va. Sept. 22, 2002; July 24, 2003; Aug. 20, 2003). We also deny White’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Reference

Full Case Name: Billy WHITE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Sergeant TAYLOR, Defendant—Appellee, and Dean Brochard, Chief Psychologist, Defendant
Status: Unpublished