David Fitzgerald Lightner appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Lightner, No. CR-93-133 (W.D.N.C. July 10, 2003). We deny Light-ner’s motion to remand his case and grant his motion for judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED