Adkins v. Holland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Adkins v. Holland, 87 F. App'x 886 (4th Cir. 2004)

Adkins v. Holland

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William T. Adkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing, under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), all but one of his claims for disability pension benefits under the provisions of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan, and the order granting summary judgment to the Trustees of the Plan on his remaining claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Adkins v. Holland, No. CA-02-249-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 20, 2002 & Mar. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
William T. ADKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael H. HOLLAND; Marty D. Hudson; Joseph P. Brennan; B v. Hyler, as Trustees; United Mine Workers of America, 1974 Pension Plan and Trust, Defendants—Appellees
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Unpublished