U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

United States v. Hopkins

United States v. Hopkins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2004 · Niemeyer, Gregory, Shedd
88 F. App'x 647

United States v. Hopkins

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willie Edward Hopkins, III, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction of his sentence. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hopkins v. United States, No. CR-97-9-2-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2003 & Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.