Pearson v. Simms

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Pearson v. Simms, 88 F. App'x 639 (4th Cir. 2004)

Pearson v. Simms

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea *640 soning of the district court. See Pearson v. Simms, No. CA-02-3647-8-RDB (D. Md. filed Dec. 11, 2003 & entered Dec. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Demetric Gray PEARSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Stuart O. SIMMS, Secretary; Captain Neder; Steven Roach; Jeff Nimes; David Lancaster, Lieutenant; Steve Zollner; William Sondervan, Doctor, Defendants—Appellees
Cited By
22 cases
Status
Unpublished