Willis v. US Attorney General

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Willis v. US Attorney General

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1982

ROBERT S. WILLIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; DIRECTOR OF FBI; PATIENT FIRST; PORTSMOUTH FAMILY PRACTICE; FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-127-2)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert S. Willis, Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan Kelley, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Kristina Helen Vaquera, TROUTMAN SANDERS, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia; Paul R. Schmidt, HUFF, POOLE & MAHONEY, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia; John Wayne Brown, Hugh Edward Black, III, Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Robert S. Willis appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Willis v.

Attorney Gen. of the United States, No. CA-03-127-2 (E.D. Va. July

3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished