Mazzarello v. Lucent Technology
Mazzarello v. Lucent Technology
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2083
JENNIFER MAZZARELLO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, a New Jersey corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-02-3576-AMD)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jennifer Mazzarello, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ross Niccolini, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jennifer Mazzarello appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons as stated by the district
court in its order granting the employer’s motion for summary
judgment. See Mazzarello v. Lucent Tech., Inc., No. CA-02-3576-AMD
(D. Md. July 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished