Jones v. Florence County
Jones v. Florence County
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2460
VICTORIA LUNN JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FLORENCE COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR OFFICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-01-3121-4-25)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victoria Lunn Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Dale Richard Samuels, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Columbia, South Carolina; Eugene Noel Zeigler, Jr., HAYNSWORTH SINKLER & BOYD, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Victoria Lunn Jones appeals from the district court’s
order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment for the Florence County Tax Assessor
Office in Jones’ employment discrimination action. In the briefing
order, Jones was warned that this court would not consider issues
not specifically raised in her informal brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Nonetheless, Jones failed to challenge the grounds for the
district court’s decision; instead, she asserted claims of
misconduct by opposing counsel, judges, and court staff.
Accordingly, we affirm. Appellant’s Motion for Order to Show Cause
is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished