U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

United States v. Ovalle

United States v. Ovalle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 23, 2004 · Luttig, Williams, Motz
88 F. App'x 609

United States v. Ovalle

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Juan Bedios Ovalle appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction of sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ovalle, No. CR-01-130-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.