Ortega v. Sawyer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Ortega v. Sawyer, 88 F. App'x 603 (4th Cir. 2004)

Ortega v. Sawyer

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jason Ortega appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ortega v. Sawyer, No. CA-03-109-3 (E.D.Va. Oct. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Jason ORTEGA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Kathleen Hawk SAWYER; Eduardo Gonzalas; George R. Havens; John W. Marshall; Willie Scott; Bob Guzik; Ronald J. Angelone; Tracy Ray; S.K. Young; Paul Lanteigne; McCabe; Jerry Brown; G.F. Driscoll; Reva L. Bedwell; Flennor; Faulks, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Unpublished