Ortega v. Sawyer
Opinion
Jason Ortega appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ortega v. Sawyer, No. CA-03-109-3 (E.D.Va. Oct. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jason ORTEGA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Kathleen Hawk SAWYER; Eduardo Gonzalas; George R. Havens; John W. Marshall; Willie Scott; Bob Guzik; Ronald J. Angelone; Tracy Ray; S.K. Young; Paul Lanteigne; McCabe; Jerry Brown; G.F. Driscoll; Reva L. Bedwell; Flennor; Faulks, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished