United States v. Diggs
United States v. Diggs
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6193
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
DANAH D. DIGGS, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 04-6259
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
DANAH D. DIGGS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon; Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CR-01-2)
Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danah D. Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Lucas Hobbs, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia; Eric Matthew Hurt, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM: Danah D. Diggs appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion for a downward departure and motion to correct sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Diggs, No. CR-01-02 (W.D. Va. Nov. 14, 2003; Jan. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.