Phillip L. Cameron appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for judgment by default and dismissing his products liability diversity action as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cameron v. MTD Product Inc., No. CA-03-75 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the *54 facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED