DeVaughn v. Johnson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DeVaughn v. Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7943

MICHAEL O. DEVAUGHN, a/k/a Michael DeVaughn,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ISAAC JOHNSON, JR., Assistant United States Attorney; J. WESLEY HOLBROOK, Assistant United States Attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-01-2657-4-24)

Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 18, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael O. DeVaughn, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael O. DeVaughn appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b). We have reviewed the record and find that DeVaughn failed

to establish ground for relief under the Rule. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b). Thus, we do not find that the district court abused its

discretion in denying the motion. United States v. Holland,

214 F.3d 523, 527

(4th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we affirm. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished