Basil Akbar appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000) and state law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Akbar v. South Carolina Probation, Parole & Pardon, No. CA-03-377-9-18 (D.S.C. Oct. 22, 2003). We deny Akbar’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED